Skip to content
SpinHub Magazine

The Iconic Puzzle Game Wouldn't Succeed at The Game Awards — Another Award Type May Address This Issue

Each time a significant honors show draws close, there’s always a demand for introducing of new categories to honor overlooked contributions and satisfy the spirits of fans dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer previously argued supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are board games, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front because like all dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case for why my demand remains most pressing above others. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and it will always start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason movie academies steer clear of genre categories. Yet it remains a necessary evil within the realm of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they hardly constitute as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to have a chance for representation, genre categories are essential.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these award types recognizing Action, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these classifications successfully include a lot of ground, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, all very different: the architectural riddles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them among existing types? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Many instances occur outstanding logic titles released every year without proper recognition in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match classification types such as Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked completely that year
  • Another creative title received no nominations during that ceremony
  • Popular arranging title got ignored recently
  • Just some puzzle games scraped into niche award types

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often modest productions, yet the craft of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Famous handheld logic titles stand as the most-played games worldwide continuing this trend for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title rivals popular creative games claiming status as most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Puzzle games wouldn’t have this problem. You could fill multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these represent titles without proper classification in important events. Brain-teaser creators operate at the demanding boundary game development, developing some of essential manifestations of the video game form. Just like movie stunt professionals, they deserve recognition. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.

About the author

Michael Bass

A London-based music journalist with a decade of experience covering underground scenes and emerging artists across the UK.

SpinHub Magazine

Type to search articles.